Repository navigation
Clarify Entire conversation coverage independently of local drafts - #186
Merged
Merged
Conversation
zzwong
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 8, 2026 06:00
zzwong
force-pushed
the
dot/entire-conversation-coverage
branch
from
November 8, 2026 06:02
ef8bc81 to
a645e79
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope
Refs #178. Shows an explicit metadata coverage notice for Entire reviews: remote discussions/findings are not imported, counts describe saved items, and local drafts remain available. No dependency on the separate discussion-reader foundation.
Verification
Independent review clear. Two focused UI tests passed; all-target UI Clippy, formatting and diff checks passed. No live Entire access or native GUI interaction qualification. No protocol, storage, or API change.